Here is a simple guide for evaluating any suggested “reforms” of U.S. policing in this historical moment.
- Are the proposed reforms allocating more money to the police? If yes, then you should oppose them.
- Are the proposed reforms advocating for MORE police and policing (under euphemistic terms like “community policing” run out of regular police districts)? If yes, then you should oppose them.
- Are the proposed reforms primarily technology-focused? If yes, then you should oppose them because:
a. It means more money to the police.
b. Said technology is more likely to be turned against the public than it is to be used against cops.
c. Police violence won’t end through technological advances (no matter what someone is selling you).
- Are the proposed “reforms” focused on individual dialogues with individual cops? And will these “dialogues” be funded with tax dollars? I am never against dialogue. It’s good to talk with people. These conversations, however, should not be funded by tax payer money. That money is better spent elsewhere. Additionally, violence is endemic to U.S. policing itself. There are some nice individual people who work in police departments. I’ve met some of them. But individual dialogue projects reinforce the “bad apples” theory of oppressive policing. This is not a problem of individually terrible officers rather it is a problem of a corrupt and oppressive policing system built on controlling and managing the marginalized while protecting property.
What “reforms” should you support (in the interim) then?
- Proposals and legislation to offer reparations to victims of police violence and their families.
- Proposals and legislation to require police officers to carry personal liability insurance to cover costs of brutality or death claims.
- Proposals and legislation to decrease and redirect policing and prison funds to other social goods.
- Proposals and legislation for (elected) independent civilian police accountability boards with power to investigate, discipline, fire police officers and administrators. [WITH SOME SERIOUS CAVEATS]
- Proposals and legislation to disarm the police.
- Proposals to simplify the process of dissolving existing police departments.
- Proposals and legislation for data transparency (stops, arrests, budgeting, weapons, etc.)
Ultimately, the only way that we will address oppressive policing is to abolish the police. Therefore all of the “reforms” that focus on strengthening the police or “morphing” policing into something more invisible but still as deadly should be opposed.